http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=885669


in reply to Re^2: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (logged out view)
in thread RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (logged out view)

The link to browsershots? That was quite interesting and seemed quite useful. It certainly showed similar bad rendering to what I saw (and informed luis.roca of prior to his posting). How does that look like spam to you?

- tye        

  • Comment on Re^3: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (browsershots)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (browsershots)
by cjb (Friar) on Feb 02, 2011 at 11:50 UTC

    I suspect that fact that browsershots is surrounded on 3 sides by flashing / blinking / animated adverts might be part of it.

    Once you get round them (in my case, finally installing adblock for chrome), it's not a bad site and potentially very useful

Re^4: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (browsershots)
by jdporter (Paladin) on Feb 02, 2011 at 12:24 UTC

    ok, turns out it was all the ads, I never even saw the intended content. (was on a computer at work with no ad-blocking software.) yes, it is quite cool indeed.

Re^4: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (browsershots)
by fisher (Priest) on Feb 03, 2011 at 11:03 UTC
    that link (browsershots) leads to an empty site in my case. I suspect Adblock plus =)