Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (self reply++)

by tye (Cardinal)
on Feb 10, 2011 at 04:37 UTC ( #887338=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (UPDATE NOTICE)
in thread RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (logged out view)

I realize it can be considered bad form to reply to your own post

I've heard that many times. I don't subscribe to that view. Replying to yourself is much better than making major updates to a node. So, replying to note major updates to a node is rather the worst of both choices.

- tye        


Comment on Re^2: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (self reply++)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://887338]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (13)
As of 2015-07-30 14:54 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (271 votes), past polls