Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Considering duplicates

by footpad (Monsignor)
on Jun 24, 2001 at 20:39 UTC ( #91075=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Considering duplicates

Great reminder...one I'm take advantage of by adding a few things that've been bugging me lately:

When a post is a true duplicate (original author submitted twice without substantial rewrite/rework), it would really help if people would see if either post has replies. If so, then consider the one that doesn't have substantial replies.

And, while we're on the subject, please enter reasons when you consider nodes. Almost every time a node has been considered "silently," I've had to vote Keep--because my personal copy of PSI::ESP seems to have a bad install, if you know what I mean.

Finally, I do not believe the following reasons are valid reasons to consider nodes:

  • "vague"
  • "answered previously"
  • "again?"
  • "poor composition skills"
  • "off-topic"

While these may not be the best nodes on the site, they generally are posted by new members or people who haven't yet learned the ropes. Please consider these opportunities to welcome and educate, rather than to criticize and rebuff. If we want people to feel welcome, then you need to roll out the mat and start smiling when they show up. Please treat them as guests, and not "freaking [l]users."

--f


Comment on Re: Considering duplicates

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://91075]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (3)
As of 2014-11-01 11:18 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (229 votes), past polls