I think you misunderstood my question. From what I can tell, this is supposed to be completely generic, being able to attach handlers to any "tag" (or have it pass through verbatim if there is no handler), with each handler receiving its children as content and returning a rendered version. With <> tags, child content has already been processed, but handling of () tags is supposed to take precedence over their children; does that mean the contents of a () tag aren't subject to any handlers? Or that upon return of the () tag handler, any tags in the return are handled? Other?
in reply to Re^4: RFC : Abstraction Markup
in thread RFC : Abstraction Markup