Re^20: aXML vs TT2

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^21: aXML vs TT2 by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 23, 2011 at 06:02 UTC
Earlier, you said "`<db_select>`" outputs "`<db_select>`", but now you say it outputs "`<db_select>`". So how do I output "`<db_select>`" if db_select is a plugin? What about outputting "`<db_select>`"?	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^22: aXML vs TT2 by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 23, 2011 at 06:17 UTC
Ok there's two issues here, outputting to a browser, and outputting a literal string. In the context of making the browser display <db_select>, you can use the specails the browser understands, `<db_select>` In the context of outputting the literal string the only way to do that that I can think of is using a <post_include> type plugin, and storing the string you want literally output without being processed, in a separate file which is included post processing immediately prior to exit. `in the aXML ----------- <post_include>path/to/splarg</post_include> in 'splarg' ----------- <db_select> ...` [download]	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^23: aXML vs TT2 by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 23, 2011 at 06:34 UTC
I recommend creating a builtin plugin "`<lt>`" that outputs "`<`", then one could use `<lt></lt>db_select>`.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^24: aXML vs TT2 by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 23, 2011 at 06:40 UTC
Re^25: aXML vs TT2 by chromatic (Archbishop) on Oct 23, 2011 at 22:51 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^25: aXML vs TT2 by keszler (Priest) on Oct 23, 2011 at 20:10 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^23: aXML vs TT2 by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 23, 2011 at 06:38 UTC
What's a "<post_include> type plugin"?	[reply]
Re^24: aXML vs TT2 by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 23, 2011 at 06:47 UTC
Re^25: aXML vs TT2 by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 23, 2011 at 06:58 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here


No such thing as a small change
	PerlMonks