Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re^7: Politeness (to one another) is a virtue

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Nov 21, 2011 at 21:49 UTC ( #939332=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^6: Politeness (to one another) is a virtue
in thread Politeness (to one another) is a virtue

in specific calling someone else a "liar"

Look again sunshine. The first accusation of lying in the thread starting at your link was not by me. And for the record, the original accuser throws that accusation around like confetti.

Once again, you read half a thread and don't follow the conversation. Hence you jump to the wrong conclusion.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.


Comment on Re^7: Politeness (to one another) is a virtue
Re^8: Politeness (to one another) is a virtue
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Nov 21, 2011 at 22:13 UTC

    Did I write that you are the only person on this site who behaves rudely? No, but even if I had, "But he was mean to me first!" is an excuse I don't accept from mature adults who really ought to behave better.


    Improve your skills with Modern Perl: the free book.

      Did I write that you are the only person on this site who behaves rudely?

      No. But you are quite happy to besmirch my name, dragging me into a thread I had studiously stayed out of.

      Meanwhile, I don't see you popping up into threads defending me against unfounded accusations from the other party in the thread you cited.

      Nor do I see you using his name as a crude diversionary tactic to cover up your own assumptive knee-jerk misconclusions.

      is an excuse I don't accept

      And I should give a monkeys what you will accept?

      Because:

      • you're royalty?
      • you're paying my wages?
      • you're the ultimate arbiter of good manners?
      • you're He who must be obeyed?
      • you're not exhibiting exactly the same propensity as the third party when called out on your own error, to try and divert attention from by any means fair or foul.

        Including ...

      • (you're not) ... doing exactly what you've accusing me of.

        Being rude to me, by dragging my name into your argument.

      Rudeness is not confined to the use of certain words people choose to take offence at. Intent is everything. And by bringing my name into this thread, it was your intent, to divert from your own mistakes. And that is rude.


      With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
        And I should give a monkeys what you will accept?

        You're an adult. It's your prerogative to care, or not, whether people find (update: some of) your comments unnecessarily rude, aggressive, and unpleasant.

        Nor do I see you using his name...

        It's a silly fallacy to claim that I must either address every injustice in the world that you care about or none at all. (Should ikegami have continued that silly discussion? Probably not. Did you bait him? I believe so.)

        ... you are quite happy to besmirch my name

        Do you now claim that you have no history of calling people liars and calling their motives into question? I certainly don't believe that anyone with janitor access here has surreptitiously added smirch to some of your posts.

        you're not exhibiting exactly the same propensity as the third party

        Nope; my post explains the assumption I made and my mistake, and I'm leaving it saying so. Yet everyone's more than welcome to follow the link I provided and read the entire thread. Every reasonable and responsible person can come to his or her own conclusion as to the accuracy of what I wrote.


        Improve your skills with Modern Perl: the free book.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://939332]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (13)
As of 2014-07-30 09:04 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (230 votes), past polls