Pdf from the point 1 doesn't provide enough information to make any assumptions regarding relative performance of DES and SHA512. The fact that throughput of 3DES running in unspecified mode was 6 times less than throughput of SHA512, doesn't mean anything. 4 is a complete rubbish. In my view you are totally making facts up.
Pdf from the point 1 doesn't provide enough information to make any assumptions regarding relative performance of DES and SHA512.
If you cannot not read a simple graph, then this discussion is pointless.
(Notice also the highlighted text: ... the most secure function, SHA-512, is also the fastest of four investigated hash
And nothing is "made up". It is all laid out for you to read for yourself. If you are incapable of doing so despite the lengths I have gone to make it possible for you to verify every single bloody step, then fine. Bury your *&*&$%$£^ head in the sand.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.