Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Modern Perl 2011-2012 Edition

by bms (Monk)
on Mar 08, 2012 at 19:19 UTC ( #958519=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Modern Perl 2011-2012 Edition
in thread Modern Perl 2011-2012 Edition

Considering no one is spamming anything and I can't shill what I wrote myself and claim to have done, your 'input' is /dev/null. I believe the word your looking for is advertise. That would've been acceptable. However, considering that shilling can be a criminal act, I decided to reply. I politely suggest that you use discretion when placing accusations. And on the record, one link to the original source seems appropriate to me.


Comment on Re^2: Modern Perl 2011-2012 Edition
Re^3: Modern Perl 2011-2012 Edition
by jdporter (Canon) on Mar 08, 2012 at 21:36 UTC
    .... I believe the word your looking for is advertise ....

    Whatever.

    I politely suggest that you use discretion when placing accusations.

    Discretion fully engaged. I stand by the accusation.

    one link to the original source seems appropriate to me

    If you had copied the entire review in full, I would have been annoyed but not enough to say anything. The fact that you are using your perlmonks post as a teaser to get people to read your blog is over the line and inappropriate.

    And considering that this was your first and only post on PerlMonks, I posit that my evaluation of the appropriateness of your post has substantially more merit than yours.

      If you had copied the entire review in full...

      After skimming both, I believe the OP did so.

      And considering that this was your first and only post on PerlMonks, I posit that my evaluation of the appropriateness of your post has substantially more merit than yours.

      That's a silly logical fallacy and quite irrelevant.

      The fact that you are using your perlmonks post as a teaser to get people to read your blog is over the line and inappropriate.

      The relevant question to me seems to be "Does the post here add any value to the site?" Even if the review elsewhere contains more information, this post here is sufficiently substantial. (In other sections, people demand that posters mention that they've cross-posted elsewhere.)

      I think you're taking far too much offense for something not worth arguing.

        If you had copied the entire review in full...
        After skimming both, I believe the OP did so.

        Oh. You're right. It does seem so. I wish I had noticed, so that I could have taken the other lemma, annoyed but not enough to say anything. For that, I apologize.

        That's a silly logical fallacy and quite irrelevant.

        Suffice it to say that we disagree entirely on this point.

        The relevant question to me seems to be...

        That's one relevant question.

        not worth arguing.

        I guess we don't share that evaluation of the situation.

        I also think that maybe, given your interest in this particular case, you ought to recuse yourself.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://958519]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2014-09-21 12:12 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (168 votes), past polls