Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Thoughts on Git, Mercurial, Github, and Bitbucket.

by educated_foo (Vicar)
on Mar 26, 2012 at 13:31 UTC ( #961666=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Thoughts on Git, Mercurial, Github, and Bitbucket.
in thread Thoughts on Git, Mercurial, Github, and Bitbucket.

Both git and mercurial (and darcs for that matter) are huge improvements over centralized SCMs like SVN. You could argue for days which one to use, and won't get any conclusive results.
This. git and Mercurial are pretty much equivalent.

I wouldn't use Darcs, because it has (had?) huge performance problems with large repositories, and doesn't seem to have enough developers. There's also Bazaar, but it is terrible. (Emacs adopted it some time ago, and someone quickly created a git gateway.)


Comment on Re^2: Thoughts on Git, Mercurial, Github, and Bitbucket.
Re^3: Thoughts on Git, Mercurial, Github, and Bitbucket.
by moritz (Cardinal) on Mar 26, 2012 at 14:16 UTC

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://961666]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-08-01 06:38 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (257 votes), past polls