Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: Unusual Closure Behaviour

by Dominus (Parson)
on Jul 14, 2001 at 07:08 UTC ( #96661=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to (tye)Re: Unusual Closure Behaviour
in thread Unusual Closure Behaviour

Says tye:

First, neither of those are closures. They are both examples of static variables and named functions. The term "closure" refers to a code reference that also carries along some variables. In neither of these case is the $x being carried around in a code reference (in part because no code references are being used).
There is indeed code reference. It is stored in the symbol table for the main package. It points to a CV, just like any other code reference, and the CV has a pointer to the pad, which does have the $x variable captured in it, just like any other closure.

So yes, it is a closure.

Mark Dominus
Perl Paraphernalia

Comment on Re: Unusual Closure Behaviour

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://96661]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2015-11-26 18:18 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (705 votes), past polls