Re^10: Fixing broken CPAN modules without author cooperation

in reply to Re^9: Fixing broken CPAN modules without author cooperation
in thread Fixing broken CPAN modules without author cooperation

Noone ...

Anonymous Monk

Same thing.

T'is easy to be controversial for the sake of it when there are no consequences attributable to you; and you can deny all knowledge if it goes tit's up,

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

The start of some sanity?

Comment on Re^10: Fixing broken CPAN modules without author cooperation
Re^11: Fixing broken CPAN modules without author cooperation by Anonymous Monk on Apr 27, 2012 at 14:47 UTC
Same thing. T'is easy to be controversial for the sake of it when there are no consequences attributable to you; and you can deny all knowledge if it goes tit's up, What could possibly go tits up? I don't see how this is any more or less controversial than my Howto abandon rights to a cpan module and stop getting bug reports for it?	[reply]
Re^12: Fixing broken CPAN modules without author cooperation by BrowserUk (Pope) on Apr 27, 2012 at 14:53 UTC
What could possibly go tits up? Every cpan module rapidly acquired half a dozen unauthorised versions each (wrongly) correcting some trivial typo or extending it brokenly, in completely incompatible ways. ... than my ... Are you sure that's one of yours? Cos I'm not! :) With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. The start of some sanity?	[reply]
Re^13: Fixing broken CPAN modules without author cooperation by Anonymous Monk on Apr 27, 2012 at 15:04 UTC
Every cpan module rapidly acquired half a dozen unauthorised versions each (wrongly) correcting some trivial typo or extending it brokenly, in completely incompatible ways. Why would anyone do that? No, scratch that. So what if they do that? They can do that already. Are you sure that's one of yours? Cos I'm not! :) Oh chromatic you rascall, I thought you were ikegami	[reply]
Re^12: Fixing broken CPAN modules without author cooperation by Anonymous Monk on Apr 27, 2012 at 15:14 UTC
Hey you liar! That's not your thread; its mine!	[reply]


There's more than one way to do things
	PerlMonks

Re^10: Fixing broken CPAN modules without author cooperation

The best material for plates (tableware) is: