Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Perl Complains of Nested Quantifiers

by AnomalousMonk (Monsignor)
on May 22, 2012 at 23:14 UTC ( #971908=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Perl Complains of Nested Quantifiers
in thread Perl Complains of Nested Quantifiers

A concern was expressed about "catastrophic backtracking." I'm curious about ... whether your solution would satisfactorily avert it.

It would not. AFAIU, possessive quantifiers like  ++ *+ ?+ {n,m}+ are just special, limited cases of the general  (?>...) atomic grouping. See example below.

>perl -wMstrict -le "my $s = 'foobazbazbaz foobazbazbaz'; print 'match 1' if $s =~ m{ foo (?> (?:baz)+) baz }xms; print 'match 2' if $s =~ m{ foo (?> .* baz) baz }xms; "
(no output)


Comment on Re^3: Perl Complains of Nested Quantifiers
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://971908]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-07-25 23:39 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (175 votes), past polls