Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Cowboy Neal with Hat
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?

by thomas895 (Friar)
on May 29, 2012 at 15:22 UTC ( #973046=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?

I voted None because the -> makes more sense, and you should always use Safe and strict ;-)

~Thomas~
I believe that the source code to life is written in Perl :-)


Comment on Re: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
Download Code
Re^2: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
by de-merphq (Beadle) on May 29, 2012 at 15:29 UTC
    I am curious what relevance you think Safe has, and why you would consider a deprecated module mandatory?

    Update: oh, maybe it is not deprecated.

    ---
    alter ego of demerphq

      Safe, while perhaps not the best example, does allow execution without the risk of your program dieing. I guess it's for the folks who have something against eval.

      ~Thomas~
      I believe that the source code to life is written in Perl :-)
        Um, no, eval prevents dieing, Safe prevents ops you don't allow (in theory) like exit, system, etc

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://973046]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-04-18 00:25 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (460 votes), past polls