Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on May 31, 2012 at 13:41 UTC ( #973523=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
in thread What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?

I don't see why:

~ ~ ~ > is any less acceptable than = or $bool &= $mask;

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

The start of some sanity?

  • Comment on Re^4: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
  • Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
by phaylon (Curate) on May 31, 2012 at 15:02 UTC

    One is supposed to look like an arrow, the other one doesn't. It's actually a good demonstration. In your scenario, ~> would be much closer to the other operators using ~ than to the deref operator.


    Ordinary morality is for ordinary people. -- Aleister Crowley

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://973523]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2016-06-27 00:51 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My preferred method of making French fries (chips) is in a ...











    Results (333 votes). Check out past polls.