Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re^4: What is a really old version of Perl? (you lost)

by jgamble (Pilgrim)
on Jun 26, 2012 at 16:56 UTC ( #978467=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^3: What is a really old version of Perl? (you lost)
in thread What is a really old version of Perl?

Sure, but combine that with the oft-heard statement, "I don't program in perl, I program in CPAN."

I only recently changed my CPAN packages from requiring perl 5.6 to requiring perl 5.8.3. Not because my code requires it, but because the Build/Make utilities are finally dropping support for pre-5.8 perls. (Note that I'm referring to the "requires" key in Build.PL or Makefile.PL, not in the module source itself.)

Now for many, probably most, packages that goes back ridiculously far back, but I don't write OS- or WWW-specific packages, and I have no reason not to support as many people as possible.

I suppose you could start a campaign to force people to upgrade their perls by using the requires keyword with perl => 5.16 (for example), but I frankly don't see the point. Set the minimum version to what's needed, and let the end-users sort it out.

Comment on Re^4: What is a really old version of Perl? (you lost)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://978467]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (8)
As of 2015-11-25 13:27 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (675 votes), past polls