Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"

Explanations for Voting

by cciulla (Friar)
on May 01, 2000 at 15:26 UTC ( #9792=monkdiscuss: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

If something is pretty cool or amusing, we give it a vote++ without an explanation, which is OK.

=Flame on

Unfortunately, some monks vote-- without the benefit of an explanation. FWIW, I have been hit with a couple of these, but that's not my motiviation, as this does not further perl, perl development, nor the author's knowledge of why his/her writeup "sucked."

Perhaps a general rule of thumb would be that if you feel the need to vote--, give an explanation (i.e., doesn't compile, "I'd rather take a poke in the eye with a sharp stick than look at your code," etc.).

Please see RE: RE: This, too, was wasted on my wife. for a pithier version of this.

=Flame off

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: Explanations for Voting
by BBQ (Deacon) on May 02, 2000 at 09:29 UTC
    Agreed! It is rather unfortunate that there are people that feel a need to vote-- just 'cause they have to. Its even worse when one votes--, logs off, posts something as AM and logs back in again. There are a few nodes where it seems clear that this is the case.

    My father says, "If you don't have anything good to say, don't say anything at all." and I'm sure good in this case could be s/good/productive/. Why vote-- if you can't make it better?

    I remeber back in Meditations there was this node (The Code of the Warrior) which was pretty lame, but it created a pretty long thread with nice comments and hardly any Anonymous Monk postings (nothing noteworthy at least). A great example of where people disagree and comment openly, IMHO, what everyone should do.

    # Trust no1!
RE: Explanations for Voting
by BigJoe (Curate) on Jun 03, 2000 at 04:45 UTC
    I personally read through the posts and look for interesting and really informational posts or posts that help me in what I am trying to do. I give these nodes a ++. The only time a -- is really needed if it blatenly bad. Or like cciulla said give an explaination why.
Re: Explanations for Voting
by moritz (Cardinal) on Jun 19, 2009 at 13:11 UTC
    Perhaps a general rule of thumb would be that if you feel the need to vote--, give an explanation

    That kinda goes against the grain of "don't feed the trolls". Also if you require a justification, you'd end up discussion the justification, creating endless meta threads.

    So I don't like the idea.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: monkdiscuss [id://9792]
Approved by root
[ambrus]: Corion: ah, so you want a library that parses HTTP, and you want to do the IO yourself, and don't want a full AnyEvent wrapper.
[ambrus]: Corion: I think I parsed a HTTP header from a string with LWP once. You can definitely use that to create a HTTP message too. The problme is
[ambrus]: that if you do that, you'd have to find where each HTTP response ends, which is nontrivial if you want persistent connections (essential for performance if you have small requests).
[Corion]: ambrus: Yes, ideally an API that I feed the incoming data piece by piece and that I can ask "is that response done" and "what should I do next" and "please construct the appropriate redirect for me"
[Corion]: ambrus: Yes, ideally the module would do all that nasty stuff for me and give me a way to ask it what the current situation is
[ambrus]: Corion: you could also consider using some wrapper over the multi interface of curl, I think Net::Curl might be a good one, since implementing enough of what it expects from the event loop might be easier than a full AnyEvent interface.
[ambrus]: Corion: you could also consider using IO::Async and its POE driver and some HTTP module for it, but I don't know if that would solve your problems with AnyEvent+POE

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (16)
As of 2016-12-07 16:02 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    On a regular basis, I'm most likely to spy upon:

    Results (130 votes). Check out past polls.