Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Why no living Qt binding?

by Tanktalus (Canon)
on Jul 19, 2012 at 14:41 UTC ( #982636=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Why no living Qt binding?

Volunteers work on what itches them. So, apparently, no one with the proper tuits has this itch. (I have this itch, too, but not the tuits.)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://982636]
help
Chatterbox?
[pryrt]: 1nickt, sprintf "%.16e", $v will always give enough precision to see 1 ULP (the smallest fractional part) of a standard 64bit Perl NV*
[pryrt]: (*: for systems where $Config{nvsize}==8 )
[pryrt]: Thus, that's "enough precision" to tell the difference between 1.0 and 1.0+1ULP
[pryrt]: But in what circumstance does your problem arise? When, in Perl, does the integer 1 not work identically to the floating-point NV 1.0000000000000000 e0?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (15)
As of 2017-05-24 19:11 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?