Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous

by anazawa (Scribe)
on Aug 03, 2012 at 01:45 UTC ( #985141=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous
in thread 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous

Thanks for your suggestion. Your code output the following:

Ambiguous call resolved as CORE::each(), qualify as such or use & at a +mbiguous_calls.pl line 12. Ambiguous call resolved as CORE::chop(), qualify as such or use & at a +mbiguous_calls.pl line 18. dump() better written as CORE::dump() at ambiguous_calls.pl line 19. Ambiguous call resolved as CORE::dump(), qualify as such or use & at a +mbiguous_calls.pl line 19. name: Ken Takakura main::our() was called at ambiguous_calls.pl line 8. Use of uninitialized value $person{"name"} in scalar chop at ambiguous +_calls.pl line 18. Abort

This result shows us that delete and our belong to "weak keywords", and each, chop and dump don't.

The following was quoted from regen/keywords.pl:

145: -chop 160: +delete 163: -dump 164: -each 261: +our

Plus (+) signs maybe mean "weak".

Your comment meant a lot to me :)


Comment on Re^2: 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://985141]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (3)
As of 2015-07-03 23:28 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (57 votes), past polls