Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: string concatenation, which way is better?

by trizen (Friar)
on Aug 08, 2012 at 21:27 UTC ( #986365=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to string concatenation, which way is better?

Both are good, but if you concatenate files and want to make your code portable, I recommend the File::Spec::Functions module.

Something like this:

use File::Spec::Functions qw(catfile); my $filename = catfile($file_dir, q{filename1.log.} . $today_date);

Back on the topic. The following codes are equivalent:
1. $this . q{/} . $that
2. join(q{/}, $this, $that)
3. "$this/$hat"
4. do{local $"=q{/}; "@{[$this, $that]}"}
5. sprintf('%s/%s', $this, $that)

Most used are: 1, 2, 3.


Comment on Re: string concatenation, which way is better?
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://986365]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-08-29 08:38 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:











    Results (277 votes), past polls