Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Perl Elitist Code vs Functional Code

by patcat88 (Deacon)
on Aug 11, 2012 at 04:10 UTC ( #986855=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Perl Elitist Code vs Functional Code
in thread Perl Elitist Code vs Functional Code

Following certain J language best practices. 1000s of classes. No method may be longer than 25 lines. Inheritance charts that must be printed on the DesignJet. Abstraction for the sake of making work. Public properties are forbidden. No flags or options permitted, only derived classes. All getters and setters methods. Main logic placed in exception handling. No documentation of course. The guy who made the API will have a job for life, after he is fired he will be rehired as a consultant for 4x more. Since nobody can sit down and use his code without years of reverse engineering. A very smart programmer indeed.

Don't invest time in elaborate APIs and abstraction unless you have already have a plan for future improvements which are only limited by funding or minor business model demands at the moment. If you can't whiteboard the plans on why you need abstraction, you dont need it. If you are metriced by the line, go with all the OOP fluff and keep adding classes. If you are paid by the project, go functional with the least amount of typing to get the job done. Nothing I said says to copy code instead of proceduring it.


Comment on Re^2: Perl Elitist Code vs Functional Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://986855]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-07-11 11:57 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    When choosing user names for websites, I prefer to use:








    Results (224 votes), past polls