Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW

Re: Hash tables, are they really what we see?

by remiah (Hermit)
on Oct 03, 2012 at 05:19 UTC ( #996980=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Hash tables, are they really what we see?


I did some benchmark for perl hash vs in-memory SQLite several days ago. Number of records that you are interested seems similar with my case, have a look at this thread if you are interested in.

Hash lookup is fast. There are cases in-memory sqlite is better than hash.

  • Comment on Re: Hash tables, are they really what we see?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Hash tables, are they really what we see?
by heatblazer (Scribe) on Oct 03, 2012 at 06:27 UTC

    Thank you for that nice reference. It was interesting to read your benchmark. If I got to a huge project like that one, I`ll most definitely ask for wisdom.

      Wisdom is sometimes useful even if one is not involved in a huge project.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://996980]
[1nickt]: Throws on error, I believe
[1nickt]: But should handle month as number or word
[TCLion]: I am breaking down the line and putting the date in the correct order during output
[TCLion]: at least that's the plan
[1nickt]: Corion this looks good, from the pod: "there are 9000+ variations that are detected correctly in the test files (see t/data/* for most of them). If you can think of any that I do not cover, please let me know."
[TCLion]: some moron put the date like this : Mon Feb 20 09:31:30 2017
[Corion]: 1nickt: Yes, the module sounds promising indeed
[1nickt]: "putting the date in correct order" how?
[Corion]: TCLion: Whee ;)
[TCLion]: need to put like this : 2017-02-20 09:30:53

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (14)
As of 2017-03-23 14:53 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

    Results (288 votes). Check out past polls.