|P is for Practical|
Prevention of algorithmic complexity attacks.
Hm. That is reasoning for randomising the seed for the hashing algorithm; but not reasoning for changing the hash algorithm itself.
It also doesn't explain why you would do it on a hash-by-hash basis rather than a per-process basis.
I don't get the reluctance to share this information?
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re^12: Hash order randomization is coming, are you ready?