Comment on

but not reasoning for changing the hash algorithm itself

Sure it is. A strong hash function is harder to attack.

why you would do it on a hash-by-hash basis rather than a per-process basis.

Concerns over information exposure of key order to an attacker.

I don't get the reluctance to share this information?

If there is any reluctance it is purely that of me wanting to avoid a long dialog repeating what has already been said elsewhere. I have a lot of demands on my time these days.

---
$world=~s/war/peace/g

In reply to Re^13: Hash order randomization is coming, are you ready? by demerphq
in thread Hash order randomization is coming, are you ready? by demerphq

Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!

Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.

Please read these before you post! —

Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:

a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr

Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:

	For:		Use:
	&		`&`
	<		`<`
	>		`>`
	[		`[`
	]		`]`

Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?

See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.


more useful options
	PerlMonks

Comment on

The best material for plates (tableware) is: