|laziness, impatience, and hubris|
Comment onby gods
|on Feb 11, 2000 at 00:06 UTC||Need Help??|
Now I wonder: Could there be cases, where a process gets killed while being in the critical region, BUT the lock is not being released (and therefore all other processes would be locked out forever)?
In a nutshell: No, that cannot happen.
However, if a process terminates whilst holding a lock, it may be some time before the OS gets around to releasing the lock -- dependent upon the availability of suitable system resources -- so attempts to acquire the lock should be programmed to retry, without tight loop polling, as a tight polling loop can itself be the cause of the unavailability of those system resources.
(For more info, see the "Remarks" under LockFile(Ex)(), which is the system call that underlies perl's emulation of flock() on Windows.)
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.