Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
I think I understood you. Please correct me where I have not.
Stated more simply, you inferred sexism where it could not exist and without consultation voiced that unfounded charge in a public forum.
Later in the thread you inferred homophobia and voiced the charge, again without foundation, publicly.
Those two combined open up a third possibility, defined in European and other legal doctrines as 'hate mongering'.
I strongly suggest that you stop now and seek both salient education and appropriate legal advice.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re^4: How many man-hours would you estimate you have invested in learning Perl?