Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

I frankly suspect that CPAN is “what all the fuss is really about.”   A language is a language is a language ... but a language plus a powerful and extensive library of (mostly...) known-good software is a tool.

I don’t think it wrong to say that “CPAN will never change, because it should never change.”   There are millions of man-hours of effort represented in that code base, and there are well-known, well-understood methods for working with it which are by now deeply embedded in all sorts of mission critical working procedures.   The rightful resistance to change is tremendous, no matter how “–er” some “improvement” might be.

Sometimes we overlook just how good we do have it.   For example, a few years ago at A Prominent Place-of Legendary Expertise, I watched as someone decided to endeavor to replace a very important Perl subsystem with Ruby.   Observing that Ruby had “gems” that appeared to be more-or-less equivalent, they (self-)confidently plowed ahead ... into a hedgerow of FIXMEs and TODOs.   The depth and maturity of the Ruby packages, at that time, were nowhere close to being “equivalent to” Perl’s, and they neglected to take that properly into account – or, I suspect, even to consider it – during their initial project planning.   They looked at Ruby at its then state of the art, and saw Perl at its then state of the art, and did not prove their guiding assumptions.   The outcome was painful to watch.   Now, it goes without saying that the Ruby teams are no slouches, and this is n-o-t language-bashing (or team-bashing!), but the maturity and completeness of the CPAN library is also very much “what the fuss is about.”

In every case, “the contributed library” is a fundamental part of every language system, and its raison d’être.   In some odd way, a programming language is really just a tool that enables you to apply existing, well-tested solution libraries to your problem de jour.   (And, oh yeah, to construct and manipulate data structures.)

In reply to Re: Would you stay with Perl if there were no CPAN? by sundialsvc4
in thread Would you stay with Perl if there were no CPAN? by sedusedan

Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    and all is quiet...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others chanting in the Monastery: (5)
    As of 2018-03-18 12:05 GMT
    Find Nodes?
      Voting Booth?
      When I think of a mole I think of:

      Results (230 votes). Check out past polls.