Please note that, for several hours, the above node contained just this:
Go write one. :-D
Now, presumably in response to this original unhelpful reply being downvoted,
subsequently heavily edited it, adding
new paragraphs, but without indicating he had done so
This is a violation of long-standing Perl monks
as indicated at the Perl Monks FAQ (How do I change/delete my post? and How do I post a question effectively?):
Mark the changed/new content with the word "Update."
Is this a new sundialsvc4 tactic,
to go with previously seen tactics (touched on at Re^2: Maximum down-votes per monk/day and Maximum down-votes per monk/day) namely:
- Not providing code to prove his pet theories.
- Ignoring posts that demonstrate flaws in his technical advice.
- Re-posting the same flawed technical advice over and over, even after it has been shown to be flawed.
- Repeatedly posting the same home-spun wisdoms to questions to which they barely relate.
- Repeatedly opening new discussions on banning anonymous monk and downvotes
- ... while repeatedly claiming he does not mind being downvoted!
- Making unfounded accusations that he is being downvoted by sock-puppet accounts and bots (e.g. here, here, here).
- Not following up on bugs he claims to experience with this site, in particular being repeatedly logged out.
- Posting at length on topics on which he has limited experience or expertise.
- Replying to the wrong post, thus losing context.
- Decorating posts with extravagant typography, stylistic devices, flowery analogies, and unnecessary quotes.
Update: After being criticized for never posting code,
sundialsvc4 appears to be experimenting with a new tactic,
extemporaneous code (again again again again),
and untested code
and a quasi-Perl sketch with C++ comments.
Update: Wow, on Jun 23 2015, sundialsvc4
actually posted some working code!
And still responding to the wrong post
I see (and again and again and again and again
and again and again
And replying with lots of words but little real content.
Update 2017: And, though I thought it impossible, the annoying typography seems to be getting worse: Re: Anonymous Monk comment(s) on questions.
Update 2015: Wow, sundialsvc4 has all ten worst nodes of the month!
Worst Nodes of The Month
As of Aug 27, 2015 at 01:48 UTC, Next refresh in 20 hours and 30 mins ±15 min
Update 2017: Done it again on his return.
Worst Nodes of The Month
As of Jun 14, 2017 at 12:36 UTC, Next refresh in 14 hours and 30 mins ±15 min
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
| & || & |
| < || < |
| > || > |
| [ || [ |
| ] || ] ||