Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

Please note that, for several hours, the above node contained just this:

Go write one.   :-D
Now, presumably in response to this original unhelpful reply being downvoted, sundialsvc4 subsequently heavily edited it, adding five new paragraphs, but without indicating he had done so.

This is a violation of long-standing Perl monks posting etiquette, as indicated at the Perl Monks FAQ (How do I change/delete my post? and How do I post a question effectively?): Mark the changed/new content with the word "Update."

Is this a new sundialsvc4 tactic, to go with previously seen tactics (touched on at Re^2: Maximum down-votes per monk/day and Maximum down-votes per monk/day) namely:

  • Not providing code to prove his pet theories.
  • Ignoring posts that demonstrate flaws in his technical advice.
  • Re-posting the same flawed technical advice over and over, even after it has been shown to be flawed.
  • Repeatedly posting the same home-spun wisdoms to questions to which they barely relate.
  • Repeatedly opening new discussions on banning anonymous monk and downvotes
  • ... while repeatedly claiming he does not mind being downvoted!
  • Making unfounded accusations that he is being downvoted by sock-puppet accounts and bots (e.g. here, here, here).
  • Not following up on bugs he claims to experience with this site, in particular being repeatedly logged out.
  • Posting at length on topics on which he has limited experience or expertise.
  • Replying to the wrong post, thus losing context.
  • Decorating posts with extravagant typography, stylistic devices, flowery analogies, and unnecessary quotes.

Update: After being criticized for never posting code, sundialsvc4 appears to be experimenting with a new tactic, namely posting extemporaneous code (again again again again), pseudocode, and untested code and a quasi-Perl sketch with C++ comments. Update: Wow, on Jun 23 2015, sundialsvc4 actually posted some working code!

And still responding to the wrong post I see (and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again). And replying with lots of words but little real content.

Update 2017: And, though I thought it impossible, the annoying typography seems to be getting worse: Re: Anonymous Monk comment(s) on questions.

Update 2015: Wow, sundialsvc4 has all ten worst nodes of the month!

Worst Nodes of The Month

# Node Author Rep
1 Re^3: Ternary vs. Sort vs. Max sundialsvc4 -17
2 Re: Refactoring old modules to use roles sundialsvc4 -14
3 Re^4: Disadvantage of not supporting pthreads in perl and how perl overcomes? (cores) sundialsvc4 -13
4 Re: forgoing explicit file close sundialsvc4 -12
5 Re: Ternary vs. Sort vs. Max sundialsvc4 -12
6 Re: Unable to Understand grep and hash use for prime no. sundialsvc4 -12
7 Re: how hard is it to find a job without a degree? sundialsvc4 -11
8 Re: [SOLVED] Dereferencing a pointer returned from Win32::API with unpack 'p' sundialsvc4 -11
9 Re: Reaped nodes no longer visible? sundialsvc4 -11
10 Re: Distributing non-Perl script in a Perl distribution? sundialsvc4 -11
As of Aug 27, 2015 at 01:48 UTC, Next refresh in 20 hours and 30 mins ±15 min

Update 2017: Done it again on his return.

Worst Nodes of The Month

# Node Author Rep
1 Re: Restricting Anonymous Monk to SOPW sundialsvc4 -21
2 Re^2: Sort undef sundialsvc4 -18
3 Re^3: Big thank you to the Perl community. sundialsvc4 -18
4 Re^2: Help me decipher code containing map function sundialsvc4 -18
5 Re: How can I get the four highest valued letters in an array? sundialsvc4 -17
6 Re: Parsing incorrect html sundialsvc4 -15
7 Re: Anonymous Monk comment(s) on questions sundialsvc4 -15
8 Re: Big thank you to the Perl community. sundialsvc4 -14
9 Re: I can upvote a node multiple times! Well... sort of. sundialsvc4 -13
10 Re: How do I make a PSGI program do costly initialisation only once per process, not per thread? sundialsvc4 -13
As of Jun 14, 2017 at 12:36 UTC, Next refresh in 14 hours and 30 mins ±15 min


In reply to Re^2: Perl: Why you no modern web framework? by eyepopslikeamosquito
in thread Perl: Why you no modern web framework? by domje

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and all is quiet...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (5)
    As of 2017-07-23 07:59 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?
      I came, I saw, I ...
























      Results (345 votes). Check out past polls.