Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

Please note that, for several hours, the above node contained just this:

Go write one.   :-D
Now, presumably in response to this original unhelpful reply being downvoted, sundialsvc4 subsequently heavily edited it, adding five new paragraphs, but without indicating he had done so.

This is a violation of long-standing Perl monks posting etiquette, as indicated at the Perl Monks FAQ (How do I change/delete my post? and How do I post a question effectively?): Mark the changed/new content with the word "Update."

Is this a new sundialsvc4 tactic, to go with previously seen tactics (touched on at Re^2: Maximum down-votes per monk/day and Maximum down-votes per monk/day) namely:

  • Not providing code to prove his pet theories.
  • Ignoring posts that demonstrate flaws in his technical advice.
  • Re-posting the same flawed technical advice over and over, even after it has been shown to be flawed.
  • Repeatedly posting the same home-spun wisdoms to questions to which they barely relate.
  • Repeatedly opening new discussions on banning anonymous monk and downvotes
  • ... while repeatedly claiming he does not mind being downvoted!
  • Making unfounded accusations that he is being downvoted by sock-puppet accounts and bots (e.g. here, here, here).
  • Not following up on bugs he claims to experience with this site, in particular being repeatedly logged out.
  • Posting at length on topics on which he has limited experience or expertise.
  • Replying to the wrong post, thus losing context.
  • Decorating posts with extravagant typography, stylistic devices, flowery analogies, and unnecessary quotes.

Update: Added extra tactics (repeatedly opening new discussions on banning downvotes while claiming he does not mind being downvoted).

Update: After being criticized for never posting code, sundialsvc4 appears to be experimenting with a new tactic, namely posting extemporaneous code (again again again again), pseudocode, and untested code and a quasi-Perl sketch with C++ comments. Update: Wow, on Jun 23 2015, sundialsvc4 actually posted some working code!

And still responding to the wrong post I see (and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and [id://1135069|again). And replying with lots of words but little real content.

In reply to Re^2: Perl: Why you no modern web framework? by eyepopslikeamosquito
in thread Perl: Why you no modern web framework? by domje

Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (13)
    As of 2015-07-31 10:32 GMT
    Find Nodes?
      Voting Booth?

      The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...

      Results (276 votes), past polls