![]() |
|
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation | |
PerlMonks |
Comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
maybe locking the variable before I update it? I was thinking that each thread is updating a different hash key of the variable, so it should be safe to update this way? Or does it need to be locked before each join statement? All your updates to %Found are done within the same thread, so there is no need to lock anything. Besides which %Found isn't a shared variable, so you couldn't lock it if you tried. Any suggestions on how to do this better? Apart from this:
Could be more efficiently written as:
Not really. It is hard to see any scope for you not getting all the results produced by the external commands. Perhaps you could print out the size of @results before returning and then sum those and compare it with the size of @Final? With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re: creating unknown number of threads and then join results
by BrowserUk
|
|