The stupid question is the question not asked | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
The problem with this new key randomisation code is not the non-determinacy it introduces -- that was already there a long time since; albeit in a lesser form. The problem is that is a pointless prophylactic that doesn't even come close to solving the "problem" that was used to justify its addition to the code-base. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re: Truly randomized keys() in perl 5.17 - a challenge for testing?
by BrowserUk
|
|