XP is just a number  
PerlMonks 
Comment on 
( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml )  Need Help?? 
(Tsts this Limbic~Region sabotaging our worklife balance again! ;)
Some theory: For a minute I thought this can be trivially solved by counting the normalization of all words (<=8) from the dictionary in a hash... e.g.
As next step successively the count from all smaller words had to be added to covering words, e.g striking the "n" from "ceelnort" leads to "ceelort", so $count{ceelnort}+=$count{ceelort} But than I realized that the best covering word from the dictionary is not necessarily the best solution. take this counterexample for 3 out of 4 letters, the number showing the coveragecount
so the word (a,b,d) is the maximum with a count 4, but the set (a,b,c) would cover 5 words!!! (yes this also works with repeated letters) IMHO this problem belongs to the family of Maximum coverage problem and Set_cover_problem, so finding a guarantied best solution shouldn't be trivial w/o brute force. OTOH adapting the sort order of letters might already lead to very good solutions...
Cheers Rolf ( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)
updateMaybe you can use the above count hash to solve the dual problem: "which of the n8 letters cover the minimum of words" (n including repetition) E.g. "d" is in only one out of 6 words with 4 letters => the remaining 3 letters cover 5 words. "c" is only in 2 remaining words => (a,b) cover a maximum of 3 words and so on. Not sure if this leads to the guarantied best solution, sounds to easy... =) In reply to Re: Challenge: 8 Letters, Most Words
by LanX

