Thanks for the posts so far.
I've searched the perl-porters mailing list archive. Other
than obfuscated .sigs, etc., I've only found one
thought-provoking mention (in a comment in a patch) of %_.
The author says (something like) "Someday, we may have to
change the %_ hack."
Anyone know if %_ has a specific purpose, or is it an artifact
of the typeglob creation, per takshaka?
Since _ variables ($_, @_) hold arguments, would %_ make
intuitive sense to you as "the variable holding named
arguments"? It really was a random thought, but since I
thoroughly enjoy learning idiomatic Perl, this idea struck
me with some force.
Other than declaring it local (which suggests some deeper
meaning in and of itself), how would you feel about code
(a subroutine) which stores its named arguments in %_?
Does this help or hinder self-documentation?
P.S. Why can't I "maintain" my original post? I would prefer
to simply edit it, rather than make a new post for updates...
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
| & || & |
| < || < |
| > || > |
| [ || [ |
| ] || ] ||