There's something fundamentally wrong with measuring complexity based
on low level analyses of code and using the outcome to judge the
quality of code.
Most people will agree the grammar of the musings of Shakespeare is
much more complex than Dr Suess books. Does that mean the childrens
books have a higher quality than the plays?
There are other problems as well. Such analyses can only focus on a
particular implementation. It doesn't cast any judgement on a proper
algorithm. It will favour a linear seach of a sorted array over a
binary search, because the linear search requires less conditions to
It doesn't mean you shouldn't use such a tool. It just means that you
have to be very careful with what you do with its results.
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
| & || & |
| < || < |
| > || > |
| [ || [ |
| ] || ] ||