Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??
Having recently booboo'd by considering a node for deletion that in hindsight should not have been considered (see On Responsible Considerations as to why I feel I should not have - it was OT, which is no reason to consider stuff for deletion), I'd like to rehash the subject of consideration a bit.

As the above mentioned node, and many others touching on consideration, rightly state, consideration can lead to nodes getting reaped, which is a very serious thing. I sure would not like seeing one of my nodes vanishing in a puff of smoke, especially if I'm a new and inexperienced monk still getting my feel for the monastery, and I don't think anybody will disagree with me. Consideration is a serious thing indeed.

Unfortunately, I only read On Responsible Considerations after I had considered a node for deletion, which is of course too late. This leads me to my point: is it technically possible to somehow force a "first time considerer" to read that node before considering any nodes? And what is the monks feeling about the desirability of such a contraption?

Okay, one can make the point that when a monk reaches friarhood, (s)he should have enough of a feel for the procedures and culture of the monastery to act responsibly and look for information on this kind of thing before using it, and that certainly is a valid point. However, it is easy to miss information, be it through laziness or just through the overwhelming amount of info that is available (something to do with a forest and trees). I know that in my case, I did some searching around on consideration and found some nodes on the various shapes and colours of the beast and how to use it responsibly, but as I said, I only came across On Responsible Considerations too late.

Then again, having to read a node and click on some button before doing an action might quickly degenerate into the usual "EULA acceptance" behavior: click without reading. I dunno. Any opinions?

CU
Robartes- keeping his fingers off the consider button for a while


In reply to Another consideration on considering by robartes

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others exploiting the Monastery: (4)
    As of 2014-07-14 05:52 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      When choosing user names for websites, I prefer to use:








      Results (255 votes), past polls