|The stupid question is the question not asked|
OK, the reason you use "automated" accessors instead of using the hash directly is so that the accesor sould be changed at some point without messing up the clients. The internal representation might change, or you might need to hook either the get or the set (or both) to perform other actions, such as keeping the state in sync or reporting debug events.
Having the lvalue return the hash element means the assignment, the setter part, is not under your control. You can't change the code behind setting the value (if the representation changed, for example) without affecting the callers. The only thing it does is let you change the name of the hash element (big deal), or hook "access" without caring whether it will be a get or set and without knowing the new value if a set.
So, I don't use it, since it doesn't do what I want of an accessor.