|
|
| There's more than one way to do things | |
| PerlMonks |
Comment on |
| ( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
Hmm. I looked into this (god knows why, im not a math type at all, nor do I use random numbers for anything serious). My code is as follows:
Ive run it a few times for various large number of iterations and it does seem like sequences of 0 are just slightly more common than other numbers. I dont have the stats skills currently and I can't be bothered doing the research to find out how to find out how much the deviation is, or if its signifigant. Update: Nah. I did a few more runs, I now dont think there appears to be much difference. Im hoping tilly or one of the other math types comes in and explains all this for us. :-)
---
demerphq First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
In reply to Re: Random numbers Perl ok! (I think)
by demerphq
|
|