Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Joe
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

I think the more accurate Comp-Sci phrase is "not well defined".

For any given implementation, you can tell what will happen, because it is very unlikely to vary from what happened last time on that same implementation.

It may well vary with other implementations.

The implementers may (and do) choose not to define the behaviour.

  1. Because it may vary across implementations.
  2. Because the explanation my not appear logical or rational.
  3. Because it isn't a useful behaviour.

Mostly, because if they do define the behaviour, then

  1. they will have to ensure that the defined behaviour is consistent across platforms and versions.

    Which if the behaviour is generally non-useful, and is likely to be influenced by things (like compilers) beyond their control, then the extra work that this would commit them to is not worth it.

  2. the defined behaviour will have to be defendable and defended.

    Also a waste of energy for what is essentially a non-useful behaviour.

But given the OP's disclaimer; statement that this was purely an academic exercise; etc.; his being condemned on the basis of a non-sequitous statement, and a short phrase in an obscure document that the behaviour "is same as C"--where it may be defined as not being well-defined, but my attempts to located such definition in K&R or Waite Group's guide haven't located it--hardly seems justified.


Examine what is said, not who speaks.
"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"Think for yourself!" - Abigail
"Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algoritm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon

In reply to Re^4: Quantum Weirdness and the Increment Operator by BrowserUk
in thread Quantum Weirdness and the Increment Operator by barrachois

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others imbibing at the Monastery: (10)
    As of 2014-04-25 08:28 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      April first is:







      Results (585 votes), past polls