|
|
|
Your skill will accomplish what the force of many cannot |
|
| PerlMonks |
Comment on |
| ( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
(Pulling this from the cb)
You know, there's only one place where I've come to think that self-chaining of mutators is a good idea, and that's in things like java's StringBuffer.append: basically, when the manipulator method is an accumulator of some sort. So I've seen self-chaining, for example, in a C++ class that did checksums: Or the more familiar: (again, C++) Here "dec" and "hex" aren't manipulators in the same sense as above, quite, but the syntax is clearly very similar. Again, though, the sense is that << is acting as an accumulator, and what passes through it adds on to what was there before, instead of being a "setter" method. So getting back to Perl, this is in my opinion a perfectly respectable interface for a file-parsing library: In this case, addRecType, while changing the state of $Ifile_format, is adding on new potential record types, and not setting some distinct value.
In reply to Re: Mutator chaining considered harmful
by fizbin
|
|