Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
This isn't going to solve this problem, but I have to ask.

Are you being paid to train the offshore team?

If you've got a contract house doing code, then that contract house should be providing you suitably capable workers to actually produce working solutions. Why are they giving you someone unfit for that task?

Typically, offshoring is to accomplish more for a lower cost. Offshore teams should be ready, fungible, and awaiting your requirements specifications. If there's training to be done, it should be done by the offshore team before that programmer is assigned to your project payroll.

I'm not against offshoring itself (in the send jobs to India sense), but I have noticed that many "onshore" companies really have no idea how to get much for their investment. The middle management just counts the heads offshore and report it to higher management for bonuses. If you send work offshore inappropriately, it's going to be less effective than hiring core domestic staff.

Four good rules of thumb about offshoring teams:

  1. the offshore team does the work because it's a geographically sensitive task (e.g., supporting Malasian services in Malasia)
  2. the offshore team does the work because it's not a core competency nor a corporate strategy of the onshore team (e.g., developing code isn't a core competency of an insurance company)
  3. regardless of reason, the work that is to be done by an offshore team should be insular and share few dependencies, but the management still needs to stay in touch with actual operations
  4. the work that the offshore team must do needs to be specified in excruciating detail, and that means that your management needs to know exactly what they want before they start; you can't expect piecework teams to invent something for you

Too many companies just ship their core competencies overseas, and wonder why the quality doesn't keep up or why the secrets leak out. Too many companies just ship their services overseas, and wonder why there's a culture clash or why a timezone hell ruins all their effectiveness. Too many companies just suggest a basic approach, expecting the teams will work out a solution, and wonder why it takes twice as much time to go through the waterfall model of research and development.

Maybe it's completely appropriate that you are training someone offshore. I just doubt that it fits with either of the rules of thumb. If you care to comment, I'd like to hear more about it.

--
[ e d @ h a l l e y . c c ]


In reply to Are you being paid to train the offshore team? by halley
in thread Learning Exercises by ropey

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    [Corion]: holli: Ooof :)
    [hippo]: Cut should beless than 20% after tax, though. :-)
    [Corion]: hippo: Yeah, but at least two years ago, it still was close enough to 20% cut
    [Corion]: But I have a very positive experience with a four day workweek and a three day weekend. I can't easily go back though to full money.
    [Corion]: That is easy without having to pay for a house, a wife or children though. If I had any of these, or any two of these, the decision wouldn't be that easy.
    [ambrus]: wait. I understand no wife and children, but how do you not have to pay for a house?
    [hippo]: I had a low-paid job about 20 years ago and seriously considered going down to a 3-day week. Would have worked 60% of the time for about 80% of the cash.
    [Corion]: ambrus: Well, I pay rent, but don't own a house with variable/ unforeseeable costs

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others studying the Monastery: (10)
    As of 2017-09-21 15:13 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?
      During the recent solar eclipse, I:









      Results (249 votes). Check out past polls.

      Notices?