Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??
Hello fellow Monks.

I've been thinking about this for a while - and after some time I posted it on devshed.com Perl forum. Got some nice responses and a hint that I should post it here (after I refine it a little bit). So here I am.

Currently to create web applications with Perl, you have (mostly used) two options : mod_perl and mod_cgi

1. mod_perl - great, fast and beside requiring from you to be a good programmer isn't widely available (security problems mostly - some people point out higher memory usage). So you need some form of dedicated hosting (virtual private host an option too) to be able to run it.

2. mod_cgi - It has served us for years but it's getting quite old and what most people care for - it's slow.

[There are other things like Fast CGI, Apache::PerlRun and things like that, but they are even less available than mod_perl. Or run under mod_perl, so it's basicly same thing.]


What I thought that it would be a good thing is that we should get something between these two. Something that would be faster than mod_cgi, yet not as "complicated" as mod_perl. As you may know : "Sometimes, less is more!".

Ideally it would :

- intended for plain people, regular John Doe's who doesn't have money or knowledge to get an dedicated hosting.

- be able to run unaltered Perl/CGI code, even if it's bad style ...

- be part of Apache distribution. Actually it should replace mod_cgi if it can comply with previous

- be faster than mod_cgi by using some of the techniques of mod_perl, not necessarily as fast as mod_perl

That's about it. If anyone has something to add, I would like to hear it.

My idea :

- Embed Perl "inside" Apache so that it doesn't need to be reloaded on each request. It should help with the speed.

- Provide clean memory on each request, so that dirty CGI scripts would also run.

- Maybe cache things like precompiled application and such things. But then again it shouldn't cache too much things because then memory usage would rise.

My first thought when I saw Apache::PerlRun is to simply use it. But as it turns out, it's not so great. I mean, if it were so great, then Apache would be configured in such a way. That PerlRun would run all CGI scripts ...

I also wondered how PHP (I'm not sure if PHP under Apache runs only under mod_php or if there is another way) is doing it (faster than CGI - almost as fast as mod_perl but uses less memory)

Any ideas and/or comments are welcome.

PS. Please don't reply with comments about how mod_perl is great. I know! I know that it can do much more things than PHP - like Apache handlers and other things. Many replied with post like that on devshed, waisting their time to tell me something I already know. Just think that something faster than CGI, yet not as powerful as mod_perl is needed - something for the masses to use.

In reply to More than mod_cgi less than mod_perl. by techcode

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others exploiting the Monastery: (18)
    As of 2014-07-14 15:53 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      When choosing user names for websites, I prefer to use:








      Results (268 votes), past polls