Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
It also pains me to say that I found taint in the Monastery. At the bottom of the htmlvars nodegroup is a link to "launch editor." It is written in Javascript. ::Watches as monks gasp in horror, and some of the weaker ones faint dead away:: I'm sorry, but this is what it is.

What's wrong with javascript? Perl and javascript can play nicely together. Matter of fact, some of the higher functions of the monastery require javascript.


In reply to Re: The True Catacombs of Perlmonks by turnstep
in thread The True Catacombs of Perlmonks by wombat

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    [marto]: "Eugenie Scott, executive director of the National Center for Science Education, dubbed this approach the Gish gallop, describing it as "where the creationist is allowed to run on for 45 minutes or an hour, spewing forth torrents of error that the
    [marto]: evolutionist hasn't a prayer of refuting in the format of a debate." She also criticized Gish for failing to answer objections raised by his opponents"
    [erix]: one would hope evolutionists haven't any prayers anyway
    [marto]: obviously someone could be religious, but not creationist
    [erix]: "Nothing in Intelligent Design makes sense except in the light of Creationism" <-- I made that one up myself (free after Dobzhansky )
    [erix]: yes. Deplorable marto, deplorable.
    [marto]: the situation seemed similar to this one, majority of the contributrions are nonsense, doesn't address any questions ...
    [marto]: meh, I've been called worse :P

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others examining the Monastery: (9)
    As of 2017-07-28 15:43 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?
      I came, I saw, I ...
























      Results (431 votes). Check out past polls.