I'd like to hear what you think about deleting nodes which are
worthy of deletion but contain replies. Often the replies contain useful information and it doesn't make sense to destroy that info or the path to get to it.
My current thought is transferring ownership of the node to the NodeReaper
and placing a note saying this node has been harvested along with possibly a link where
you can see a preserved version of it if you're still curious. This would also remove the node from any section pages or the frontpage.
Thoughts on the matter??? Additional ideas??? Let me know what you think below.
vroom | Tim Vroom | firstname.lastname@example.org
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
| & || & |
| < || < |
| > || > |
| [ || [ |
| ] || ] ||