"be consistent" | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I wonder... A switch could be added that would tell perl that you commit to not modifying the string before utilizing $1. Then the memcopy would be unnecessary. That way you could say
And get the same effect. Of course the demons that would fly out of your nose if you said:
Would be your problem... BTW, if it isnt clear, this is the reason the memcpy is needed. Alternatively, perhaps magic could be introduced to $str so that the memcpy would only happen if $str was modified while the match vars pointed at it... A last possibility would be to not do the memcpy if the string was RO. Then you could by hand readonly the string, do the match, use $1 and then when and if you needed to modify the string undo the RO. I guess another variant could be that the /k would result in no copy, and an understanding that accessing $1 et all would be a fatal error while that regex was the last used. However the @- @+ arrays would be populated. Its just the user would be expected to do the substring operations by hand.
--- $world=~s/war/peace/g In reply to Re: An optimization of last resort: eliminate capturing from your regexps
by demerphq
|
|