Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

Perl5porters wants us to believe that they care a lots about backwards compatibility. This is, however, not true, as shown by how many of my obfuscations doesn't work anymore with recent perl versions, or they give warnings even when you don't enable warnings.

This node tries to be a comprehensive listing of which of my obfus still work and which don't. I'll try to update this node with newer breakage in the future.

  • LZ77 compression works (as of perl 5.16.1).
  • One-liner japh doesn't work: perl 5.10.0 breaks it with an unnecessary change that doesn't really fix a bug. It could be fixed somehow, for some of the similar obfus I link to still work.
  • Japh algebra works (as of 5.16.1).
  • Fun with duff's device and AUTOLOAD doesn't really count, because it was already sometimes broken when I wrote it, but it definitely doesn't work anywhere on perl 5.10.0 or later.
  • Charnames japh gives an unnecessary default warning on 5.12.0 or later. (It still gives the right result as of 5.16.1.)
  • Indigo japh doesn't work in perl 5.12.0 or later, because split in void context no longer fills @_. As a hotfix, prepend @_ = (that makes it work as of 5.16.1, though since perl 5.12 it also gives a default warning about pop _), but that ruins the aesthetics of the obfu. The second obfu in that same node works (as of 5.13.6).
  • Ode for getprotobyname still works, and so does the variant in Re (Obfu generator for): Ode for getprotobyname (as of 5.16.1).
  • Re: Pattern matching was already broken when I wrote it because it only worked on 32 bit perls that's my fault, it wouldn't have been hard to make it work on 64 bit perls too.
  • Fast Japh works (as of 5.16.1).
  • Digisig works (as of 5.16.1 here's hoping the long obsolate feature it is based on is never removed).
  • Re: a poem still works (a of 5.16.1).
  • Ode for the CORE:: package works (as of 5.16.1), but starting from 5.12.0, it gives a default warnings that reveals something about the obfu.
  • Faster japh works fine (as of 5.16.1).
  • Japh algebra revisited works (as of 5.16.1), but starting from 5.12.0 it gives an annoying default warning.
  • Twin-lines japh doesn't work and is completely unfixable: perl 5.13.6 fixes just the bug this uses. (It still works with at least 5.13.4.)
  • All of the ones in Re: Fibo Golf challenge on 3 monkeys still work as of ruby 1.9.2.
  • JAPH to commemorate the release of Perl 5.10.0 still works (as of 5.16.1).
  • All the ones in Short quines still work (as of 5.16.1), but variant e gives a default warning starting from 5.12.0. What's the deal with all these default warnings lately? Isn't the whole point of -w that the developer enables it to see what's wrong with the code but users of my code don't need to see it and worry about it?
  • A feature of use still works (as of 5.16.1).
  • General quine still works (as of 5.16.1).
  • Linux console japh still works (as of 5.16.1), provided you can find a linux console and stand far enough from your huge TFT that you can read the half feet high letters. In particular, while many Linux distributions set up the console as framebuffer text mode (which means the graphics card is set to graphical mode and the Linux kernel emulates a text console on it), but this obfu still works in such cases.
  • Re^2: The Oldest Plays the Piano still works (as of 5.16.1). The variants in Re^3: The Oldest Plays the Piano also work.
  • It's not my obfu, but only a slight change in Dollar Plus, so it's no surprise that Re: Dollar Plus still works (as of 5.16.1).
  • Both variants in Japh algebra, GF(128) edition still work (as of 5.16.1).
  • News of current disasters hidden in 1st Monasterians still works (as of 5.16.1).
  • \c*\c!\c0\c( still works (as of perl 5.16.1).
  • Just another unpack hacker still works (as of perl 5.16.1).

This trend is also not specific to the obfu I write. The following section is of course just a selection, but you monks are encouraged to post tales about your broken code in replies: then maybe p5p will listen to us and stop these incompatible changes if they hear enough people complain. (Yes, I'm not completely serious, but this is the obfu section so I don't have to say that, right?))


In reply to Bitrotten obfuscations by ambrus

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others romping around the Monastery: (9)
    As of 2014-07-30 01:01 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









      Results (229 votes), past polls