I've been a devotee of using the compiled unix/linux "find" utility in preference to File::Find or any of its variants/derivatives, because I found that for any directory tree of significant size, something like this:
was significantly faster. In fact, just for grins, I tried an old benchmark that I posted here several years ago, to see if the results were still true with reasonably modern versions (perl 5.10.0 on macosx, File::Find 1.12), and I found an order of magnitude difference on a reasonably large tree (~30K files, 90 sec using File::Find, 9 sec using "find".)
But then I ran into a case where someone had created a really obscene quantity of files in a single directory on a freebsd file server, and freebsd's "find" utility choked. (Apparently, that version of "find" was building some sort of in-memory storage for each directory, and it hit a massive number of page faults on the path in question.)
I reverted to a recursive opendir/readdir approach for that case, and it succeeded reasonably well. Under "normal" conditions, compiled "find" seems to run about 10% faster than using recursive opendir/readdir, but in that particular case of an "abnormal" directory, freebsd "find" became effectively unusable, while opendir/readdir performance was consistent with normal conditions.
I just posted a utility I wrote for scanning directories, which uses recursive opendir/readdir: Get useful info about a directory tree -- I'm sure it includes a lot of baggage that you don't need, but perhaps it won't be too hard to pick out the useful bits...