Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

On the behalf of the developers and contributors team, I'm pleased to announce that DBD::Firebird v1.00 , a DBI driver for the Firebird RDBMS server is released.

This release is not the first, but is an important milestone because it brings many changes. We hope to like what is changed and help us testing it on the new enabled platforms (OSX/cygwin/Windows with Visual Studio), but we can do that only with support from the Perl Community.

This is a announcement and also a call for more code reviewers and contributors (developers) for all platforms

The development is on GitHub at: https://github.com/mariuz/perl-dbd-firebird And the mailing list is here

Thank you,


In reply to DBD::Firebird v 1.00 released to CPAN by mapopa

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    [erix]: then you might as well send that patch to the DBIC guys :)
    [Corion]: erix: Yeah, I just found that it has no documentation at all on how to circumvent/ eliminate "1+n SELECTs" by building a local hash... I guess I have to make ->has_many do the hash lookup instead of doing the SQL query. But as the problem ...
    [Corion]: ... has only manifested itself so far through the puzzled questions of other bystanders, I won't go deeper at this time. But the DBIx::Class documentation could well do with a document on how to make "it" (that is, ORMs in general) faster ;)
    [Corion]: I find that DBIx::Class, like most ORMs makes things easy until they become performance critical and then makes it horribly hard to change things because the design is highly inflexible if you don't already know about the problems of 1+n :-/
    [choroba]: that's why I don't like similar libraries. They pretend you don't have to learn SQL, but in the end, you have to learn how SQL plus to overcome their own limitations
    [Corion]: "Just write the proper SQL beforehand" is of course the appropriate solution, but if you did that, you wouldn't/couldn't use DBIx::Class either. At least not in an obvious (to me) way.
    choroba scratches a "how"
    [Corion]: choroba: Exactly... But maybe that's just because I'm old and grumpy ;)
    [Corion]: But maybe that could also be a nice talk, how to restructure your DBIx::Class-based app to remove 1+n-style query patterns
    [Corion]: In theory, that should be easy because you should have the "where" clause from part 1 of the patterns and then do the corresponding single select using that where clause to select all rows in one go for the n other parts.

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others chilling in the Monastery: (6)
    As of 2017-09-25 11:09 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?
      During the recent solar eclipse, I:









      Results (279 votes). Check out past polls.

      Notices?