There's more than one way to do things | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Care to clarify that? Maybe add some examples? Cos like JavaFan, I don't get it. As soon as you pick any two values from group 2 (1..6), you've also already picked two values from group 1 (0..7), so there is no way to comply with your "every resulting row should satisfy the initial condition" requirement. You would either a) a pick two from both groups and therefore have 4 from the larger group; or b) pick nothing from the larger group, in which case you have nothing from the larger group. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re^3: Multiple Combinatorics
by BrowserUk
|
|