http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=1003505


in reply to Concatenate or Join?

Reducing the join and concatenation to a simple example without any file i/o, I don't get the same result when Benchmarking.

use strict; use warnings; use Benchmark qw{ cmpthese }; my @arr = ( q{abc} ) x 10000; cmpthese( -5, { concat => sub { my $ret; $ret .= $_ for @arr; return $ret; }, join => sub { my $ret = join q{}, @arr; return $ret; }, } );
$ ./spw1003500 Rate concat join concat 994/s -- -70% join 3310/s 233% -- $

Perhaps something else is skewing your timing.

Cheers,

JohnGG

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Concatenate or Join?
by tobyink (Canon) on Nov 12, 2012 at 20:54 UTC

    It depends what you're doing really. In your example, join beats concat, but that's because you are looping through an array. Here though, concatenation beats it (albeit only by about 10%):

    use strict; use warnings; use Benchmark qw{ cmpthese }; sub foo { 'abc' }; sub bar { 'def' }; cmpthese( -3, { concat => sub { my $ret = foo().bar(); return $ret; }, join => sub { my $ret = join q{}, foo(), bar(); return $ret; }, });

    And here (thanks to the Perl compiler being so good at constant folding) concatenation is more than twice as fast as join:

    use strict; use warnings; use Benchmark qw{ cmpthese }; sub foo () { 'abc' }; sub bar () { 'def' }; cmpthese( -3, { concat => sub { my $ret = foo . bar; return $ret; }, join => sub { my $ret = join q{}, foo, bar; return $ret; }, });
    perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'