Re^3: Perl & Unicode: state of the art?

> can the language be determined?

You know the answer, only with statistical certainty and dependent on the length of the text and the distance of languages.

Hand and finger (en) <=> Hand und Finger (de)

If same script lead to same delimiters can only be answered by someone knowing all 6000 languages of the world.

But already Arabic words should be a problem, maybe less if transcribed. Chinese even more.

Cheers Rolf

( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)

Comment on Re^3: Perl & Unicode: state of the art?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Perl & Unicode: state of the art? by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 08, 2013 at 02:16 UTC
You know the answer Nope. If I knew, I wouldn't be asking. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]
Re^5: Perl & Unicode: state of the art? by Discipulus (Canon) on Oct 08, 2013 at 07:32 UTC
Well come back to Babel, brothers.. Languages are live things, poetry is a valid form of a language. Processors are mechanicals things: no way to cover all the cases. Perl is digital and my brain is analogical. no hope, sorry there are no rules, there are no thumbs..	[reply] [d/l]