in reply to Re^2: On Finding, Hiring, Inspiring and Keeping
in thread On Finding, Hiring, Inspiring and Keeping
In the United States, it is not uncommon for a software developer to move from job to job every two-to-three years. Many companies use accrued vacation seniority as an incentive for staying with a company (since company pensions are largely replaced by individual 401(k) plans) and will not negotiate on vacation time for new hires. While an employee who has been with a company for more than 10 years may enjoy as much as 5 weeks of vacation, it is not unusual for a new employee to have to make do with two weeks of vacation annually. Some people never get beyond that miserly allowance if they move around a lot between jobs, and some employers also won't let a new employee use vacation for the first three or six months, until they are 'vested'.
The new job law in France (and the law's apparent demise) has been much in the news lately -- the whole thing is a little foreign (pun intended) to those of us used to an 'at-will' employment model. How do people more established in their careers in France view this law, that would have allowed employers to 'try before they buy' prospective younger employees?
It seems to me, sitting here (fairly ignorantly) in the US, that the 'entitlement mentality' evidenced by the protests and demonstrations against what appears to be a reasonable law will end up being very destructive to job growth. Won't many companies simply relocate to find a more flexible workforce (perhaps with a lower price tag), leaving the youth of France with even fewer jobs? Am I missing something in this equation?
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^4: On Finding, Hiring, Inspiring and Keeping
by wazoox (Prior) on Apr 11, 2006 at 15:47 UTC | |
by ptum (Priest) on Apr 11, 2006 at 17:02 UTC | |
by jplindstrom (Monsignor) on Apr 11, 2006 at 20:23 UTC | |
by wazoox (Prior) on Apr 12, 2006 at 07:54 UTC |