in reply to Re^2: A Better Word Morph Builder
in thread A Better Word Morph Builder
Ieronim,
I have finished benchmarking the routines. I didn't include any from this thread or this one but you are welcome to. I did not penalize any routine for processing the dictionary. Additionally, if there were a number of small variations for a routine, I only included the fastest.
I have finished benchmarking the routines. I didn't include any from this thread or this one but you are welcome to. I did not penalize any routine for processing the dictionary. Additionally, if there were a number of small variations for a routine, I only included the fastest.
Rate limbic__2 solo____1 limbic__3 limbic__4 ieronim_1 lim +bic__1 limbic__2 6.48/s -- -45% -62% -90% -95% + -96% solo____1 11.8/s 82% -- -31% -82% -92% + -92% limbic__3 17.3/s 166% 46% -- -74% -88% + -89% limbic__4 67.5/s 941% 471% 291% -- -53% + -55% ieronim_1 143/s 2104% 1109% 728% 112% -- + -5% limbic__1 150/s 2218% 1171% 771% 123% 5% + --
- limbic__1..4 from nodes 1, 2, 3, 4 respectively
- ieronim_1 from this node (updated)
- solo____1 from this node
<Reveal this spoiler or all in this thread>
Update (2006-07-03): These benchmarks do not reflect the realization I made concerning when to test if a path connection has been made that I noted elsewhere in this thread.
Cheers - L~R
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^4: A Better Word Morph Builder
by Ieronim (Friar) on Jun 30, 2006 at 19:10 UTC | |
by Solo (Deacon) on Jun 30, 2006 at 22:06 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom